From Gizmodo.com:

• He asked Congress to spend $1 billion to monitor peer-to-peer activity.
• When he was asked in 2006 about proposing net-neutrality laws, he said there was no need, since any bit-filtering violations would provoke such a huge public ruckus they'd have to hold congressional hearings anyway--and they'd be standing-room only.

You should visit Gizmodo and read the rest.  I hate that I am starting to feel like voting for Obama is yet another situation where it's the lessor of the two evils.